Русский
Sale of real estate and real property transactions support

Article`s themes

News rss

Oleg Koval's exit from prison on bail 3758 euro
Under the request of the defense, the court of the city of Saranda (Albania) decided to impose a pledge in the amount of 3758 euros to Koval Oleg Aleksandrovich. New Year Oleg will celebrate at large!
On the Day of the Lawyer and St. Nicholas Day!!!

On the night of December 18-19, Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker comes to the house and leaves gifts for the children. Day of Advocacy is also celebrated in Ukraine on December 19.

Shevchenko district court of Kyiv chose house arrest for the suspects under article 191 part 5 of the criminal code of Ukraine

Shevchenko district court of Kyiv chose house arrest for our client. who is suspected of committing embezzlement of funds in especially large sizes in a group of officials who occupy especially responsible positions.
Criminal case is being investigated by the National Police under article 191 part 5 of the criminal code.

News archive

rss2email
News



Articles

Адвокат по ДТП (дорожно-транспортным происшествиям)

Call now and get advice:+38 (050) 777-03-81 (Vodafone), +38 (096) 444-63-04 (KievStar), +38 (063) 911-06-40 (LifeCell), e-mail: info@donadvocat.com

LAWYER PRACTICE

Call now and get advice:+38 (050) 777-03-81 (Vodafone), +38 (096) 444-63-04 (KievStar), +38 (063) 911-06-40 (LifeCell), e-mail: info@donadvocat.com

Articles

АДВОКАТ ЕВСЮТИН АЛЕКСАНДР НИКОЛАЕВИЧ ДОБИЛСЯ СНЯТИЯ ОБВИНЕНИЯ ЗА УГОН АВТОМОБИЛЯ

ATTORNEY Evsyutin ACHIEVED drop charges for stealing CAR

12/20/12, the verdict in the criminal case against Raczkowski EI previously accused prosecutors of art. 185 h. 1, 289 hours. 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Through the efforts of a lawyer Evsyutin AN prosecutors dropped charges against Raczkowski EI a particularly serious crime under Art. 289 h. 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (carjacking), providing for liability to 15 years in prison.

This is a victory, for which protection was a long three years. The case was heard in the Court of First Instance of 3 years, twice conducted pre-trial investigation, conducted several examinations, including complex.

Back in 2009 Raczkowski was accused prosecutors that openly and with the use of violence to be cleared Mitsubishi Pajero car then lost control, made a traffic accident.

In fact, the victim in a state of intoxication, he got in an accident and damaged his car, and Raczkowski was a while in the passenger seat. After the accident Raczkowski took the victim out of the car and went for help, took the money in the car, so they are not taken hold unauthorized persons. However, he was accused of theft and hijacking and even sued for hundreds of thousand hryvnia.

From the outset of the investigation the defense argued that the accusation regarding the commission of an offense under Art. 289 h. 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, has not been confirmed, the evidence for the punishment for stealing a car is not enough.

However, as a justification for our client's guilt, the prosecution presented the testimony of the victim, he was able to confirm in the courtroom only partially and was not able to answer the part of the critical issues of protection, despite the blatant coherence with the prosecution.

Also on the side of the injured were several false witnesses who were administered investigation and trial misleading.

In spite of the unfair position and clearly accusatory investigation, a lawyer Evsyutin to intervene at the stage of the trial, and prove the absence of prosecution evidence, namely the witnesses who all saw the defendant driving a car, the absence of traces of finding Raczkowski driving a car ( traces of the hands, feet, potozhirovyh fat, hair and other organic matter, Raczkowski clothing items, etc.), the fact of lack of skills Raczkowski driving the vehicle.

This protection has collected evidence and could ubeditt their admissibility in court. Evidence of defense position: evidence Raczkowski, who are not refuted what - any objective evidence, but merely unsubstantiated testimony of the victim and very indirect stakeholders - 3 friends recently, the conclusion of a comprehensive forensic, autotechnical, transport and investigative expertise, the forensic immunological examination which directly confirm the testimony Raczkowski of its location in the car in case of accident, the testimony of many other witnesses who directly or indirectly support the position of the defense and testimony Raczkowski.

The defense revealed the fact that the detention Raczkowski was conducted in violation of his right to a defense and other rights granted suspects. Illegally obtained confessions and giving oneself declared inadmissible evidence by the court.

With such evidence, the Court was prepared to justify Rachkovgskogo under Art. 289 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, but the prosecutor, conceded defeat, amend the charges and ruled him out of this article.

The result of the conditional punishment (suspended sentence of 2 years) for the theft of a mobile phone and money.

Тем не менее, в качестве обоснования виновности нашего подзащитного сторона обвинения представила показания потерпевшего, которые он смог подтвердить в зале судебного заседания лишь частично и не смог ответить на часть принципиально важных вопросов защиты, несмотря на откровенную согласованность действий со стороной обвинения.

Кроме того на стороне потерпевшего были несколько лжесвидетелей, которые вводили следствие и суд в заблуждение.

Несмотря на несправедливое положение и явно обвинительный уклон следствия, адвокат Евсютин вступил в дело на стадии рассмотрения дела в суде, и доказал отсутствие доказательств обвинения, а именно: свидетелей, которые вообще видели подзащитного за рулем автомобиля, факт отсутствия следов нахождения Рачковского за рулем автомобиля (следов рук, ног, потожировых отложений, волос и других органических материй, элементов одежды Рачковского и т.д.), факт отсутствия у Рачковского навыков вождения данного автомобиля.

При этом защита собрала доказательства и смогла убедитть суд в их допустимости.  Доказательства позиции защиты: показания Рачковского, которые не опровергнуты какими – либо объективными доказательствами, а лишь голословными показаниями потерпевшего и очень косвенно заинтересованных лиц – 3-х друзей последнего, заключение комплексной судебно-медицинской, автотехнической и транспортно трассологической экспертизы, заключение судебно-иммунологической экспертизы,  которые прямо подтверждают показания Рачковского о месте его нахождения в автомобиле при ДТП, показания множества других свидетелей, которые прямо или косвенно подтверждают позицию защиты и показания Рачковского.

Защитой были выявлены факты того, что задержание Рачковского было проведено с нарушением его права на защиту и других прав, предоставленным подозреваемым. Незаконно добытые признательные показания и явка с повинной признаны судом недопустимыми доказательствами.

При таких доказательства суд был готов оправдать Рачковгского по ст. 289 УК Украины, но прокурор, признав свое поражение, изменил обвинение и исключил из него данную статью.

Результат условная мера наказания (отсрочка исполнения приговора на 2 года) за кражу мобильного телефона и денег.

© If the source is not specified, the copyright belongs to the site donadvocat.com, a direct link to that is required for copying or using of any materials.

UIP group it is:
Support of immigration for study, work and life
Protection in all government and law enforcement agencies
International consulting for Eastern and Western  Europe, South Asia, America, Africa 
The representation of foreigners in universities, immigration, border and customs services, embassies

 +38 (050) 777-03-81 (Vodafone), +38 (096) 444-63-04 (KievStar), +38 (063) 911-06-40 (LifeCell), +260 967 942 818 (WhatsApp) 

PRESS CENTER - TV                             e-mail: info@donadvocat.com                GET ADVICE ON-LINE

UIP Ukraine: www.uip.com.ua

PERSONAL LAWYER: www.personallawyer24.com 



To get back to the list of articles