Русский
The real estate

Article`s themes

News rss

Legal self-defense, lawyer Alexander Yevsiutin, legal self-defense, legal self-defense course of lawyer Yevsiutin, self-defense
Legal self-defense, lawyer Alexander Yevsiutin, legal self-defense, legal self-defense course of lawyer Yevsiutin, self-defense
Emergency consultation, detentions of TCC and SP, military commissariats, TCC lawyer, TCC lawyer, TCC and SP lawyer, TCC lawyer, TCC and SP
Do you need emergency consultation, detentions of TCC and SP, military commissariats, TCC lawyer, TCC lawyer, TCC and SP lawyer, TCC lawyer, TCC and SP?
We invite lawyers to join the partnership. Kovorkin for lawyers in different cities. International legal network
Our company provides the opportunity for lawyers to work remotely or in their region, without worrying about the availability of clients, providing the opportunity to receive clients in the center of your city as necessary.
If you are detained by law
If you are detained by law enforcement officers on suspicion of committing a crime, you have the right to a defense, you can carry out it yourself or with the help of a lawyer.
Lawyer profession. Now anyone can be a lawyer

A lawyer is a profession that requires its owner to have a high level of education, intelligence and life experience. Such qualities are achieved and acquired as a result of the entire life path and professional activity of the lawyer himself. But you can also learn to protect yourself.

Lawyer (advocate) Mr. Oleksandr Yevsiutin on issues of real estate problem on the radio "Vesti"

About real estate, a real estate lawyer, a lawyer about real estate, how to choose real estate, buying real estate, a real estate lawyer. Buy real estate in Kiev correctly.

Training course, Legal self-defense in conditions of martial law, Legal self-defense, legal self-defense, courses on Ukrainian law

Name of the course: "Legal self-defense under martial law"

1. Definition of martial law and its consequences for citizens.

2. Rights and obligations of citizens during martial law.

3. How to behave during detention, search and arrest.

4. How to properly behave during questioning and interrogation. How to contact a lawyer and get legal assistance free of charge.

5. How to apply to law enforcement agencies and the court in case of violation of rights. 

Dismissal from military service of students called up for service during martial law

Regarding the release of students called up for service during martial law.

So far, it is simply impossible for them to free themselves. That is, they are not subject to conscription, but if they have already entered the service, they cannot be released on the basis of training.

The draft law on amendments to Article 26 of the Law of Ukraine "On Military Duty and Military Service" regarding the dismissal of students, trainee assistants and graduate students can change the situation.

Statement on temporary protection of citizens of Ukraine in Portugal
Statement on temporary protection of citizens of Ukraine in Portugal
The Economic Security Bureau was headed by the head of the State Fiscal Service

The Economic Security Bureau was headed by the head of the State Fiscal Service Vadim Melnik.
Earlier, Melnik served in the tax police for more than 14 years.

News archive

rss2email
News



Articles

LAWYER PRACTICE / Articles

E-mail: [email protected]

The chance of not being sentenced for life – the case of a lawyer from Kyiv

Lawyer Alexander Evsyutin, acting on behalf of the Regional Center for Providing BVPD in Kiev No. 026-0011639 dated April 24, 2015, achieved the reversal in the Higher Specialized Court of Ukraine for the consideration of civil and criminal cases of a conviction of the highest penalty - life imprisonment.

Lawyer Evsyutin defended a previously convicted client, entering the case at the stage of its cassation consideration. The case was considered based on the cassation appeal of the convicted person against the verdict of the Kakhovsky City District Court of the Kherson Region dated November 13, 2012 and the ruling of the Court of Appeal of the Kherson Region dated August 13, 2013 regarding it. By decisions of these authorities, the client was convicted under Part 2 of Art. 115 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (murder under aggravating circumstances), and he was given the highest penalty - life imprisonment. Thus, by the verdict of the Kakhovsky City District Court of the Kherson region dated November 13, 2012, the man was convicted under paragraph. 2, 4, 13 hours 2 tbsp. 115 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to punishment in the form of life imprisonment. Based on Art. 71 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the client was finally sentenced to life imprisonment. By decision of the Court of Appeal of the Kherson region dated August 13, 2013, the sentence was left unchanged. The man was found guilty of taking the life of a young child with extreme cruelty.

In the cassation appeal, the convicted person, referring to significant violations by the courts of first and appellate instances of the requirements of criminal procedural legislation when considering the case, asked to cancel the court decisions and send the case for additional investigation. Justifying the cassation appeal, the convict pointed out that the local court passed an unreasonable verdict without examining all the evidence to confirm his guilt, in particular, did not interrogate all the witnesses. The convict also noted that the court of appeal formally considered the case against him, without conducting a judicial investigation or keeping minutes of the court hearing.

After reviewing the case materials, lawyer Alexander Evsyutin established that the testimony of the convicted person about his innocence in the murder of a young boy was indeed confirmed and not refuted by the circumstances collected in the case. Moreover, there is no direct evidence of guilt in the case that cannot be questioned, and the collected evidence has signs of falsification. Namely, a violation of the defendant’s right to defense was established, since he was deprived of the opportunity to question witnesses A., B. and C., who were not questioned at the trial; the defendant alleged falsification of these circumstances of the case in the records of their interrogations during the pre-trial investigation, and such testimony was announced at the court hearing and presented in the verdict as evidence. It was also confirmed that the conclusion of the forensic immunological examination was biased, since the question of the presence of his (the convicted person’s) traces on the object with which the victim was wounded was not investigated. In the conclusion of the forensic fingerprint examination, there is no information about the person who owns the prints on the inner surface of the walls of the building where the crime was committed, and the discovered prints do not belong to him. On one sneaker and lace, on which traces of blood were found, which could belong to the victim, no traces belonging to him (the client of lawyer Evsyutin) were found. The protocol of seizure of clothes dated June 25, 2011 was falsified, since the seizure itself was carried out on June 24, 2011, and it was not shorts, but trousers that were seized (as evidenced by the data of the protocol of his arrest), and the shorts themselves, which he gave to brother B., to him They were brought later, and it was on them that the examination was carried out. The convict testified about illegal measures during the pre-trial investigation, noting that after he refused to sign the seizure report, law enforcement officers threatened him, so he was forced to partially admit guilt.

During the debate at the court hearing, the lawyer cited the indicated facts of violation of the law and got the panel of judges to accept them when making a decision based on the results of the cassation hearing of the case. The prosecutor considered the court decisions legal and justified and objected to the cassation. However, the panel of the Supreme Court of Justice found that the court of appeal in its ruling did not give the essence of the arguments specified in the additions to the appeal, did not carefully check them, did not give an exhaustive answer to them, but only limited itself to a list of evidence without any assessment of at least one of them, in fact resorting to duplicating the content of the sentence in the definition.

The Supreme Court of Justice of Ukraine noted that while leaving the appeal of the convicted person without satisfaction, the appellate court did not provide convincing reasons for making such a decision in determining such a decision, having formally considered the appeal of lawyer Evsyutin’s client. The Supreme Court of Justice of Ukraine partially satisfied the cassation appeal of the convicted person, overturned the decision of the appellate court and sent for a new appeal hearing.

When considering a criminal case again on appeal, the court (Court of Appeal of the Kherson Region) must carefully check the evidence collected in the case, give it and the conclusions of the first instance a proper assessment. Adopt, if necessary, a decision to conduct a judicial investigation, check all the arguments of the appeal with additions and the cassation lawyer Evsyutin’s client’s complaint, and taking into account all the circumstances of the case, make an appropriate decision, setting it out in the appropriate procedural document in compliance with all the requirements of the criminal procedural law.

 

https://legalaid.gov.ua/novyny/shans-ne-buty-zasudzhenym-dovichno-sprava-advokata-iz-kyyeva/

© If the source is not specified, the copyright belongs to the site donadvocat.com, a direct link to that is required for copying or using of any materials.

Support of immigration for study, work and life
Protection in all government and law enforcement agencies
International consulting for Eastern and Western  Europe, South Asia, America, Africa 
The representation of foreigners in universities, immigration, border and customs services, embassies

 +38 (050) 477-63-83 (WhatsApp)




To get back to the list of articles